Terrorism: “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. | The more things change, the more they stay the same.”

HuT Jin June 14 2016 

“Terrorist war is part of a total war, which sees the whole of society as the enemy and all the members of a society as appropriate objects for violent actions. It is absolute war because its goal is absolute destruction of society and it accepts annihilation of persons as an appropriate means. Terrorists are the shock troops in a war to the death against the values and institutions of a society, a Western society, and of the people who embody it.”
Jeane Kirkpatrick, Former United States Ambassador to The United Nations
by Alan Simons

For many Jews and non-Jews alike knowing the names of various terrorists groups can be counted on one hand. Daesh, Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda, Boko Harem and the Muslim Brotherhood.

One group that is seemingly less interesting, with very little curiosity in the West, is the extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, or Party of Liberation. I’ve written about them many times before. My message remains the same.

HuT for short, has significant following in many parts of the world. It is I quote, “a transnational Islamic religious-political organization which has presence nearly 50 countries across the world. Hizb ut-Tahrir seeks ‘implementation of pure Islamic doctrine’ and the creation of an Islamic caliphate…  The group’s aim is to resume the Islamic way of life and to convey the Islamic da’wah to the world. The ultimate goal of this secretive sectarian group is to unite the entire ummah, or Islamic world community, into a single caliphate. The aim is to bring the Muslims back to living an Islamic way of life in ‘Dar al-Islam’ [the land where the rules of Islam are being implemented, as opposed to the non-Islamic world] and in an Islamic society such that all life’s affairs in society are administered according to the Sharia rules.'” (GlobalSecurity.org)

Get the picture?

The group claims to be a political party active in nearly 50 countries including the UK – its so-called international nerve centre – the USA, Australia and Canada. However, the group is outlawed in many Muslim countries, including Bangladesh, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Uzbekistan as well as in China, Germany, Russia, and the Netherlands. It “vehemently opposes democracy claiming that it is inconsistent with Islamic principles of government and is a tool used by the West to further conquer Muslim lands.”

In Australia, Hizb ut-Tahrir “have accused the federal government of criminalising the Muslim community through its anti-terror laws and have cited singing the national anthem as forced assimilation.”

In a paper written by Sarah Swick  and published some years ago by the U.S. based Muslim libertarian think tank, Minaret of Freedom Institute, she writes, Hizb ut-Tahrir “is rapidly growing in notoriety and popularity among Muslim youth in the Muslim world and in the West… The Party also focuses its recruitment efforts on university campuses. In Indonesia, the Party spent fifteen years as an “underground movement on college campuses in Java,” and, today, it remains a campus-based movement. This is also the case across the European continent, where HT is known to have a following primarily among second-generation immigrant Muslims attending university.”

Unlike Daesh and Al-Qaeda, Hizb ut-Tahrir says it is a non-violent political party which restricts itself to intellectual and political work.

What it says and what it does is entirely another matter.

In 2012, in Bangladesh it was reported Hizb ut-Tahrir was behind a failed coup where
“some 16 Bangladesh military officers, who were members of HuT, were accused of planning to overthrow Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s government. After the security agencies cracked down on the coup plotters, HuT claimed to have organized public speeches outside mosques across Bangladesh calling upon people to “protest against the Hasina government’s plot to subjugate the Muslim Army of Bangladesh to US-India.”

And today, as reported in the Dhaka Tribune it continues: “Hizb ut-Tahrir’s last major activity was monitored on September 4, 2015, when around 10,000 of its supporters joined in on an online video conference. As the police force continues its week-long sweep to detain militants, members of Hizb ut-Tahrir are trying to come out from hiding and reorganise their banned outfit again. As part of their efforts to regroup, Hizb ut-Tahrir is circulating leaflets urging the people to rise against the  ‘tyrannical rule of Sheikh Hasina.'”

Hizb ut-Tahrir is as antisemitic in their rhetoric as it gets.

Swick states that in Germany, the group was spreading violence and hate and had called for the killing of Jews. “In an article that was previously posted on their website, HuT said, ‘The Jews are a people of slander. They are a treacherous people who violate oaths and covenants. They lie and change words from their right places. They take the rights of people unjustly, and kill the Prophets and the innocent. They are the most severe in their hatred for those who believe…This is how they are now, and this is how they will continue to be.'”

In addition, a Hizb ut-Tahrir speaker was quoted during a speech in London at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) saying,   “Let’s be open about this – the Qur’an does not mention Zionists, it mentions Jews. They are our enemy and Insha’Allah we will finish them.”

In Copenhagen much more of the same. “The Jews are a people of slander… a treacherous people… they fabricate lies and twist words from their right context,” the leaflets read, before justifying suicide bombings in Israel as ‘legitimate’ acts of ‘Martyrdom.'”

Some years ago in Tunisia, “Hizb ut-Tahrir Tunisia organized a demo in support of Gaza on the night of Eid al Fitr to call the Muslim armies to remove the Jewish entity. It was held on Habib Bourguiba Avenue in the capital.”

But of course, as they continually remind us, they are a non-violent political party which restricts itself to intellectual and political work. Right?

“HuT has the potential to become an even more dangerous terrorist group than IS [Daesh].”

Surinder Kumar Sharma of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses is quite forthright about them:

“Hizb ut-Tahrir is a slow and steady player; it has cleverly avoided any intense global scrutiny while spreading its ideology and support base in different parts of the world. HuT, therefore, has the potential to become an even more dangerous terrorist group than IS [Daesh].”

In Canada, where I am based, Hizb ut-Tahrir has also become both a source of recruitment and concern. Mazin Abdul-Adhim Mazin, a Canadian citizen of Iraqi descent living in London, Ontario and the ‘perceived’ leader of Hizb ut-Tahrir Canada in December 2015, was reported as saying:

“Helping Syrian refugees coming to Canada and building an Islamic caliphate are part of the same cause, according to a pro-Sharia speaker at an Islamic conference in Hamilton.… The refugee increases Muslims’ political and societal clout and strengthens these calls for “the full implementation of Islam.”

According to the Toronto Sun, Hizb ut-Tahrir Canada in a press release dated January 2016 stated: “Hizb ut-Tahrir considers it impermissible (sinful/Haram) to use violence as part of this work, as the Sharia (Islamic Law) forbids it. Furthermore Hizb ut-Tahrir does not promote hate speech, rather the efforts of the Hizb revolve entirely around creating awareness of the Islamic systems and how they correctly solve mankind’s problems and disagreements are respectfully addressed through discussion and sincere debates in an intellectual manner.”

“They also advocate that the end goal is the Islamization of Canada as part of this global caliphate Article 62 of the Hizb ut-Tahrir Constitution also calls for compulsory conscription in their sought after caliphate.  It states that every Muslim male who is “fifteen years and over, is obliged to undergo military training in readiness for jihad.'”

Yeah, yeah, yeah!

Albert Einstein once said, “The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”

Hizb ut-Tahrir is against gender equality, irrespective of one’s race or nationality. The West is its target. It is intolerant of any hint of social equality for all, or of a democratic society that is open and accepting of minorities. They believe our established institutions, laws and customs are repulsive.

Perhaps as individuals the time has come for us to take a more meaningful pro-active response to this vile antisemitic, anti-democratic, anti-West and dangerous organisation. Who was it said “lost time is never found again?”

Lead Photo credit: sekmestechnologya.it

* * *


OVER SEVENTY YEARS LATER – “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” | “The more things change, the more they stay the same”

The Great Western Retreat

From the publisher of jewishinfoNews. The following article was originally published by Gatestone Institute and republished with permission by jewishinfoNews on May 4, 2016.

by Giulio Meotti
  • Giulio M JIN May 4 2016Of all French soldiers currently engaged in military operations, half of them are deployed inside France. And half of those are assigned to protect 717 Jewish schools.

  • This massive deployment of armed forces in our own cities is a departure from history. It is a moral disarmament, before a military one.

  • Why does anyone choose to fight in a war? Civilized nations go to war so that members of today’s generation may sacrifice themselves to protect future generations. But if there are no future generations, there is no reason whatever for today’s young men to die in war. It is “demography, stupid.”

On March 11, 2004, 192 people were killed and 1,400 wounded in a series of terrorist attacks in Madrid. Three days later, Spain’s Socialist leader, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, was elected prime minister. Just 24 hours after being sworn in, Zapatero ordered Spanish troops to leave Iraq “as soon as possible.”

The directive was a monumental political victory for extremist Islam. Since then, Europe’s boots on the ground have not been dispatched outside Europe to fight jihadism; instead, they have been deployed inside the European countries to protect monuments and civilians.

Opération Sentinelle” is the first new large-scale military operation within France. The army is now protecting synagogues, art galleries, schools, newspapers, public offices and underground stations. Of all French soldiers currently engaged in military operations, half of them are deployed inside France. And half of those are assigned to protect 717 Jewish schools. Meanwhile, French paralysis before ISIS is immortalized by the image of police running away from the office of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo during the massacre there.

French soldiers guard a Jewish school in Strasbourg, February 2015. (Image source: Claude Truong-Ngoc/Wikimedia Commons)

You can find the same figure in Italy: 11,000 Italian soldiers are currently engaged in military operations and more than half of them are used in operation “Safe Streets,” which, as its name reveals, keeps Italy’s cities safe. Italy’s army is also busy providing aid to migrants crossing the Mediterranean.

In 2003, Italy was one of the very few countries, along with Spain and Britain, which stood with the United States in its noble war in Iraq — a war that was successful until the infamous US pull-out on December 18, 2011.

Today, Italy, like Spain, runs away from its responsibility in the war against the Islamic State. Italy’s Defense Minister Roberta Pinotti ruled out the idea of Italy taking part in action against ISIS, after EU defense ministers unanimously backed a French request for help.

Italy’s soldiers, stationed in front of my newspaper’s office in Rome, provide a semblance of security, but the fact that half of Italy’s soldiers are engaged in domestic security, and not in offensive military strikes, should give us pause. These numbers shed a light not only on Europe’s internal terror frontlines, from the French banlieues to “Londonistan.” These numbers also shed light on the great Western retreat.

US President Barack Obama has boasted that as part of his legacy, he has withdrawn American military forces from the Middle East. His shameful departure from Iraq has been the main reason that the Islamic State rose to power — and the reason Obama postponed a military withdrawal from Afghanistan. This US retreat can only be compared to the fall of Saigon, with the picture of a helicopter evacuating the U.S. embassy.

In Europe, armies are no longer even ready for war. The German army is now useless, and Germany spends only 1.2% of GDP on defense. The German army today has the lowest number of staff at any time in its history.

In 2012, Germany’s highest court, breaking a 67-year-old taboo against using the military within Germany’s borders, allowed the military to be deployed in domestic operations. The post-Hitler nation’s fear that the army could develop again into a state-within-a-state that might impede democracy has paralyzed Europe’s largest and wealthiest country. Last January, it was revealed that German air force reconnaissance jets cannot even fly at night.

Many European states slumber in the same condition as Belgium, with its failed security apparatus. A senior U.S. intelligence officer even recently likened the Belgian security forces to “children.” And Sweden’s commander-in-chief, Sverker Göranson, said his country could only fend off an invasion for a maximum of one week.

During the past ten years, the United Kingdom has also increasingly been seen by its allies — both in the US and in Europe — as a power in retreat, focusing only on its domestic agenda. The British have become increasingly insular – a littler England.

The UK’s armed forces have been downsized; the army alone is expected to shrink from 102,000 soldiers in 2010 to 82,000 by 2020 – its smallest size since the Napoleonic wars. The former head of the Royal Navy, Admiral Nigel Essenigh, has spoken of “uncomfortable similarities” between the UK’s defenses now and those in the early 1930s, during the rise of Nazi Germany.

In Canada, military bases are now being used to host migrants from Middle East. Justin Trudeau, the new Canadian prime minister, first halted military strikes against ISIS, then refused to join the coalition against it. Terrorism has apparently never been a priority for Trudeau — not like “gender equality,” global warming, euthanasia and injustices committed against Canada’s natives.

The bigger question is: Why does anyone choose to fight in a war? Civilized nations go to war so that members of today’s generation may sacrifice themselves to protect future generations. But if there are no future generations, there is no reason whatever for today’s young men to die in war. It is “demography, stupid.”

Spain‘s fertility has fallen the most — the lowest in Western Europe over twenty years and the most extreme demographic spiral observed anywhere. Similarly, fewer babies were born in Italy in 2015 than in any year since the state was founded 154 years ago. For the first time in three decades, Italy’s population shrank. Germany, likewise, is experiencing a demographic suicide.

This massive deployment of armed forces in our own cities is a departure from history. It is a moral disarmament, before a military one. It is Europe’s new Weimar moment, from the name of the first German Republic that was dramatically dismantled by the rise of Nazism. The Weimar Republic still represents a cultural muddle, a masterpiece of unarmed democracy devoted to a mutilated pacifism, a mixture of naïve cultural, political reformism and the first highly developed welfare state.

According to the historian Walter Laqueur, Weimar was the first case of the “life and death of a permissive society.” Will Europe’s new Weimar also be brought down, this time by Islamists?

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

* * *


OVER SEVENTY YEARS LATER – “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” | “The more things change, the more they stay the same”


By jewishinfoNe.ws >>> Posted in -News
JIN photo article April 18 2016

The UN’s pathological obsession with Israel


The following article was originally published in French on April 15, 2016 by Causer.fr . No copyright infringement is intended.

UN: anti-Israel obsession

The UN Commission on the Status of Women is going after the Jewish state

by Oudy Ch. Bloch

Oudy Ch Bloch FThere is something pathetic and indecent in the pathological obsession with the UN to Israel. Especially in matters of women’s rights, other countries merit special attention, particularly in the Muslim world.

In 2015, the UN General Assembly adopted 20 resolutions against Israel against only three resolutions on the world namely, Syria, Iran and North Korea. Nothing on China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Yemen, Pakistan, Sudan and all other progressive democracies.That’s how the United Nations level put Israel. It is grotesque but true.

And 2016 clearly does not bring big changes. In its latest report, the Commission on the Status of Women of the United Nations (CSW) has again managed the feat of condemning Israel, of course. Which, on reflection, is not really a feat since the same commission made a similar report last year.

The Jewish state is, this time, abused for its alleged violence against Palestinian women. For CSW indeed  “the Israeli occupation remains the main obstacle to the improvement of Palestinian women, to their promotion, to their empowerment and participation in the development of their society.”

Regrettably, the CSW did not hear the Palestinian activist Ahlam Akram who believes that the laws on the status of Arab women are “back to the stone age” and that Arab countries do virtually nothing to improve the status of women, because they are busy with “the great campaign against Israel.”

JIN woman lashed photo April 18 2016Regrettably, the CSW was not informed that, according to Islamic law widely applied by the Palestinian Authority (West Bank) and Hamas (in Gaza), women are discriminated against by the laws governing marriage, divorce, child custody, inheritance and domestic violence, men and women do not have equal access to justice, women do not have the same value as witnesses in court.

Regrettably, the CSW did not take into account the Palestinian Center for Human Rights report which says that the recurrence of killings of women is due to the relative impunity “given to men at honor crimes” (murder of women by their own families for having extramarital relations) in an ultra-patriarchal society in which women are considered the property of his family which directs the social, sexual and professional.

Regrettably, the CSW will be not be interested in Hamas that forbids women to leave without being covered, participate in sporting events such as the marathon Gaza canceled by UNRWA in 2013 for that reason, to get on a motorcycle or cycling, hookah smoking in public, to participate in folk dances, which forces girls in schools and universities to wear the headscarf, forcing women to go out accompanied by male relatives … all in the name of a campaign of “Promotion of Virtue” reasons, according to Hamas officials by “the alarming increase of amoral behavior”.

Regrettably, the CSW does not consider this fact as an “obstacle to improving the status of Palestinian women, to their promotion, to their empowerment and participation in the development of their society.”

This is invariably the same. By voting this conviction, the CSW maintains the Palestinians in their illusion are never responsible for anything, especially not for themselves and allows them to use a forum for women’s rights as an anti-Israel forum .

There is, in this pathological obsession with Israel, something at once pathetic and indecent. Especially in matters of women’s rights, other countries deserve special attention.

Stoning of women Iran a

Nothing. Not one condemnation of the condition of women in Iran where:

– Women cannot travel, work or attend classes at the university without permission from their husbands;

– Women cannot judge, because – according to the mullahs – they do not possess intellectual faculties;

– The law permits a father to marry his adopted daughter from the age of 13 years.

Nothing about Saudi Arabia where:

– Women are considered legally a minor and therefore cannot go to the doctor, opening a bank account, travel, renew their passports without the permission of her guardian;

– The women has no right to drive;

Nothing on Sudan where:

– Sudanese journalist Lubna Ahmad Al-Hussein escaped at the point of death, sentenced to forty lashes for wearing fashionable trousers for women, prohibited by Article 152 of the Criminal Code;

Nothing on India where:

– In many villages, even today, girls are killed at birth, mainly because the marriage dowry is expensive;

– Domestic violence affects 65% of women;

– Widows are ostracized by society, abandoned and rejected because they would bear misfortune;

Nothing on Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Ethiopia, Yemen and other countries where FGM is practiced. In half of the 29 countries that practice FGM, the majority of the girls suffered before the age of 5 years and in the vast majority of the remaining cases, 15 years. The goal is to prevent sexual desire and avoid premarital relations.

Nothing on countries where Sharia law is applied, the Sharia that permits polygamy but not polyandry, which forbids women to divorce but allows a man to divorce, which requires women – to prove it raped – the testimony of four men, allowing her husband to beat her, that makes a woman be inherently inferior to man (Sura 4:34).

Nothing on the manifest “Women and the Islamic State,” written by Daesh and precise in accordance with Sharia, that marriage of girls is permitted from the age of 9 years, that women’s education should limited to the prophet’s life, the history of Islam, Sharia but also the sewing and cooking, they are not supposed to work for not to leave their homes.

Nothing on the young Samra Kesinovic, the 17 year old Austrian who had run away from home in 2014 to wage jihad in Syria, was beaten to death with a hammer after being used as a sex slave for new fighters of Daesh.

The work of the UN Commission on the Status of Women is an insult to all women worldwide. Violence, humiliation and discrimination. The UN has lost credibility once more. 

The above article can be read in French at: http://www.causeur.fr/onu-lobsession-anti-israelienne-37778.html

Oudy Ch Bloch is a lawyer called to the Paris Bar in 2003 and the New York Bar in 2009. He is a Postgraduate in Business Law from Université Paris X-Nanterre and holds a J LL.M Law of Literary and Artistic Property (UCLA Los Angeles, USA)

(Photo credits: pinterest.com; sipa.com; impunitywatch.com)

* * *


OVER SEVENTY YEARS LATER – “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” | “The more things change, the more they stay the same”