Antisemitism! The abhorrent display of pathological hatred of Jews continues.

This article has been updated from the original version.

The American writer Eric Hoffer once said, “Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life.”

by Alan Simons

Saadia Gaon, (Sa’id ‘ibn Yusuf al-Fayyûmî) the great ninth-century Jewish philosopher born in Egypt and father of both scientific biblical exegesis and Jewish philosophic theology, who is regarded as the chief Jewish legal authority of his time in the world, commented that whoever is consumed by the desire for revenge gets into a frame of mind of refusing to accept intercession or entertaining any feeling of compassion or pity or listening to any plea of clemency.

Hatred and Revenge. Over one thousand years later Saadia’s comments still reflect the attitude that we have learnt nothing. For very little at this time seems to be based on the two-way acceptance of my world is also your world.

Today, among the lives of many people in America there are some who maintain that the best thing to strive for in their world is to take revenge on one’s enemies. Right now the satisfaction of the thirst for revenge cannot be clearer than it is in our society!

Today, we gloat over people’s misfortunes, we instil a hatred in each other’s cultures and religions that no civilized government has a hope in hell, or will in stopping. It is a hate that has its own direction, its own time and space, egged on by the perverse nature of fanatics utilizing the services of mobile phones, social media and Internet websites. Nor, one must not forget, the antisemitic actions of numerous religious leaders.

Today, the traditional western media broadcaster and newspaper, continue to flout their flag-waving old-boy school-tie elitists’ defiance to remain in a bygone era, in what they believe is their absolute right to express their view to us of what freedom of speech is. They must also accept responsibility for continuing to light the matches of religious hate.

hate (2)Today, what media has the moral fibre to acknowledge that the hatred of Jews is not primarily caused by the Middle East conflict, nor by actions taken by the Trumps of this world, but by the age-old belief of their Jew-hating forbearers across the globe, that Jews are a conspiracy for evil in the world? The Middle East conflict is the result, not the cause, of this appalling hatred of Jews.

Today, it is terrifying, not least because of the attitude of our society, which far from springing to the defence of Jews against inexcusable bigotry and mortal threat, is either indifferent to it or actually shares the prejudice and points a finger at our Israeli brethren for causing the threat.

Today, the non-Jew, in general, not only remains an indifferent individual towards their Jewish brothers and sisters but also to many other sectors of our society. Be it the Yazidis, the Rohingya Muslims of Myanmar, The Yemeni catastrophe, the children of southern Syria, and may I say it, the unspeakable and ongoing persecution in Arab lands of Lebanese, Iraqi and Syrian Palestinians. Canada’s smug and self-satisfying image of tolerance to outsiders, compared to how it has treated its First Nations people, has been well documented and continues to be so.

Today, we make direct comparisons to what apartheid South Africa was and that of Israeli Jews and their Israeli Arab cousins. Insinuations about links between Jews and the Nazis abound daily.  

Today, we have observed what Beijing has called the “biggest [USA-China] trade war in economic history.” At a particular juncture, how many hours will pass before countless non-Jews express their abhorrent display of pathological hatred of Jews by accusing the Jew of having a hand in this trade war, just to make a profit?

In 1762, J.J. Rousseau, the 18th century French philosopher said, “The Jews in Dispersion have not the possibility of proclaiming their own truth to humankind; but I believe that when they once have a free Commonwealth, with schools and universities of their own where they can speak out safely, we shall be able to learn what it is that the Jewish people have to say to us.”

Today, in 2018, 256 years later, yes Jews have one thing to say. “We want frickin peace!”

Advertisements

GAZA’S HAMAS: A bunch of failed deluded theatrical playground psychopaths.

 

The real face of Hamas: Hamas’ Al Qassam Brigades’ Spokesman makes it very clear: Iran funds Hamas’ terrorism through donations of weapons. Iran=Hamas. – Credit: The Israel Project.

by Alan Simons

 

Dr Martin Sherman is the founder and CEO of the Israel Institute for Strategic StudiesHe served for seven years in operational capacities in the Israeli intelligence community. From 1990-91 he held the post of ministerial advisor to the Israeli government and has testified as an expert before the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) of US Congress, in a hearing on economic and security trends in the Middle East. He writes a regular and widely read column “Into the Fray” in the Friday edition of the Jerusalem Post.

In an interview he gave on May 29, 2018, on Israel’s ILTV he was asked in reference to the current situation in Gaza, “What should Israel be doing?” He replied: “Every single one of those mortar shells that came into Israel today was basically an attempted murder to murder the residences around the Gaza Strip.”

He added:

“The only solution to Gaza is not reconstruction but deconstruction… Because of the nature of the society in Gaza, this will go on and on and in the end, to put it bluntly, there will either be a large Arab population in Gaza or Jews in the Negev. But, there won’t be both over time.”

The interviewer remarked that out of roughly two million Gazans who are living in the Strip, not all of them are in Hamas’ pockets, to which Sherman replied:

“We should stop considering Palestinians as prospective peace partners and relate them as they relate to themselves, as implacable enemies and treat them as such. In the Second World War, not all the Germans were bad people, but when you have a class of collectives you must decide which collective you want to win, yours or theirs. And if you’re willing to sacrifice your individual, your collective rights for their individual rights, you’re going to lose.”

For my part, in my article written earlier in May for jewishinfoNews and republished in The Times of Israel, I referred to Hamas as being “Repulsive to the core.” I said:

“Clamouring to celebrate the daily antisemitic claptrap and hate mongering diatribe against Israel, and piggybacking on their current sick mentality of propaganda, lies and self-denial, it should come as no surprise to anyone that Hamas continues to threaten Israel with an abhorrence selection of vile and psychotic disorders that must have dead Nazis applauding in their graves.”

A theatre of violence

For now, one might look at it in the same way as a long-lasting theatre of violence. Every full-house performance has a standing ovation, mostly from Western media.

The historian and cultural theorist Robert Young writing on violence said that violence “is a phenomenon that has a history. Violence is not so much a question of a single act that breaks a supposed continuum of nonviolence or peace. Rather, violence is best understood as a historical cycle of violence and counter-violence. In other words, violence is not one but two. It is a double act that traps human beings in a repetitive pattern from which it is very hard to escape.”

“This past weeks’ abhorrent theatre by Gazans with their list of mediocre actors performing on the world stage and screaming to get attention, smells worse than a dozen rotten eggs floating on a polluted lake.”

It is a repetitive theatre that deserves a repetitive quote from me:

“For Hamas’ egregious population, that day has surely arrived. Hamas and its population over the years have had every opportunity to join the civilized world. Unfortunately, led by a bunch of deluded playground psychopaths, they have utterly failed. It is they who have failed. We carry no guilt for their actions.  If they wish to be devoured, it is their choice and their choice alone!”

Martin Sherman is accurate. One should treat them as they relate to themselves, as ruthless enemies. Let it be so!

* *

For your free jewishinfoNews subscription please enter your email address on the designated link located on the top right-hand side of this post. Your name and email address will never knowingly be shared with third parties.

Hizb-ut Tahrir: Antisemitic. Anti-Christian. Pro Pan-Islamist Terrorist Organization. Banned in many Muslim countries!

 “That way is to mobilize the Muslim armies and bring together all able-bodied Muslims to eliminate the Jewish entity from its roots and only then will the al-Aqsa be liberated and cleared of the scum and evil of the Jews and their offsprings….”

HuT regards itself as a “peaceful pan-Islamist organization.” What complete and utter twaddle!

“The danger with Hizb-ut Tahrir (HuT) is ever more serious and often overlooked because it is not always visible and does not conform to stereotypes.”  – PAK Institute For Peace Studies(PIPS)

     by Alan Simons

I have been reporting on this known terrorist group now for eleven years and I intend to continue doing so. To remind my readers and to put it as simply as possible: This is an antisemitic and anti-Christian terrorist organisation who wants to conquer the world with its blatant egregious wish to demolish the democratic system of your government and in its place initiate a caliphate in your country. It has been quietly waiting in the shadows for the opportunity to pronounce itself as the foremost trustworthy leader in the Muslim world. Their timing is impeccable. Their aim is clearly defined. I repeat. To establish an Islamic Caliphate or Islamic state in your country and to resume the Islamic way of life for all.

Hizb ut-Tahrir (HuT) is not a recent upstart. It was founded in 1953 in Jordanian Jerusalem by Taqiuddin al-Nabhani, an Islamic scholar and Palestinian Sharia judge.

Hizb ut-Tahrir (HuT) is front and centre of an enthusiastic Islamist bunch of antisemitic, anti-West, anti-capitalist and anti-democratic educated ideological vicious revolutionists who, certainly in the West and Australia, dress as if they are on the board of one of President Trump’s blue-chip companies. As seen in this Australian Broadcasting Company click here>>> interview <<< their leaders are articulate, arrogant, well educated and when interviewed have done a good job of avoiding answering questions about their real intentions with a stylish line that could have been written by the best PR spin doctors.

Over the years HuT has matured into a global sophisticated organisation that maintains the illusion to ignorant Westerners, that they have an interest in reaching its goals of a caliphate peacefully and through non-violent means. They believe the establishment of the caliphate would provide stability and security. This forms part of their primary objective.

By the last count, HuT is operating in more than 50 countries worldwide including the USA, Canada and the UK. Australia has been pussyfooting to ban the organisation for years. However, HuT is “banned in many Muslim-majority countries, including Indonesia, Bangladesh, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Uzbekistan. In Malaysia, the Selangor Fatwa Committee  has outlawed HuT, declaring the group ‘deviant.’   

Recently the Indonesian government, the most populous Muslim country in the world, revoked Hizbut ut-Tahrir’s charter, “citing incompatibility with government regulations extremism and national ideology.” Needless to say, HuT is currently fighting Indonesia’s revocation with the same vigour as they do in expressing their hatred of Jews!

Last year in Singapore, a HuT member was arrested for propagating online extremism.

The group is also banned in China and Russia, but not in Ukraine or Lebanon, to name a few.

In Kyrgyzstan, the State Committee for Religious Affairs recently banned websites containing “materials propagandizing extremist ideology of religious extremist organizations.” Hizb ut-Tahrir and the Taliban are two organizations included in the list.

HuT regards itself as a “peaceful pan-Islamist organization.”

Earlier this month in Bangladesh, The Daily Sun reported; “Law enforcers are looking for top 10 militants of the banned militant outfit, Hizb ut-Tahrir Bangladesh, including its chief coordinator Zakaria, detective sources said.“These 10 fugitive militants under the leadership of kingpin Zakaria are secretly trying to reorganise the terrorist organisation’, the sources added:

“In the wake of the police crackdown, many of its activists, who had gone into hiding, have started coming out of their hideouts. They are now trying to conduct militant activities and other crimes in the country, the sources said.

It was in 2009 that Hizb ut-Tahrir showed its antisemitic hand as a so-called “peaceful pan-Islamist organization.” To quote:

  •         “Al-Quds [Jerusalem] cannot be liberated by resorting to protests and sit-in… it can only be restored by mobilizing armed forces to eliminate the Jewish entity!
  •         “That way is to mobilize the Muslim armies and bring together all able-bodied Muslims to eliminate the Jewish entity from its roots and only then will the al-Aqsa be liberated and cleared of the scum and evil of the Jews and their offsprings….
  •       “The way is to regard the entire Palestine as one right from the banks of the river in the east to the sea in the west, without differentiating the lands occupied in 1948 or in 1967; whoever relinquishes even one part of the land, actually facilitates surrender of part after part, whoever displays weakness, humiliation is his destiny…”

         -18th Shawwal, 1430 A.H. Hizb ut-Tahrir. October 6, 2009

HuTs British chapter in London is regarded as the “nerve centre” of the movement. It was in 2007 that BBCs Panorama first took HuT to task. A former British supporter referring to HuT stated, “They always promoted hatred, they promote hostility…”

How strong is the case against HuT?  Well, in Denmark, comments by HuT go back even further. In 2003 Newsnight revealed HuT had published a leaflet in Denmark attacking Jews: “Kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out where they have turned you out.”

The leaflet continued: “The Jews are a people of slander… a treacherous people,.. they fabricate lies and twist words.”

 

 

During the past three years, two significant reports have been published worthy of bringing to your attention.

Surinder Kumar Sharma, of the Indian Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, states in an article in Global Ecco:

 “There is another militant organization worthy of serious attention. Hizb ut-Tahrir (HuT), or the Party of Liberation, is a radical Islamist group that, like ISIS, calls for the uniting of the Ummah and the return of the Caliphate.” He adds, “Given the fact that HuT already has a wide reach and is successfully inducting and radicalizing educated youth, the outfit has the potential to stage coups and uprisings against governments and regimes that it considers un-Islamic or aligned with anti-Muslim powers. HuT may well prove dangerous because it has an immense influence on people, especially in the way that it legitimizes the cause to establish a Caliphate. While the world’s focus currently is on ISIS, it would be a grave folly to ignore the growing influence of HuT and its global agenda.”

Dr James W. Moore, Ph.D., LL.M., is a Defence Scientist in the Socio-Cognitive Systems Section at DRDC Toronto, Canada. Previously, he worked for twenty years as a Strategic Analyst responsible for research and reporting on the Middle East with the Directorate of Strategic Analysis/CORA at Canada’s National Defence Headquarters in Ottawa.

In a report written in The Canadian Military Journal and published by National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces, Moore refers to the term ANSA and describes it as, “An autonomously operating planned group that has the capacity to use violence to achieve political ends.”

He adds:

“Is Hizb-ut-Tahrir an ANSA? Should the group fall under our analytical microscope? Given the ambiguities in the group’s ideology and strategy with respect to the use of violence, culminating in the fact that we cannot with confidence rule out the group’s resort to such methods under certain circumstances, the case can be made that HuT should be considered an ANSA for analytical purposes.

In a report published in 2008 by Islam in Europe, the Dutch security service AIVD said:

“The movement [Hizb ut-Tahrir] operates exceptionally secretly and has a cell structure with an almost military hierarchy. The ideology is characterized by virulent anti-Zionism, and intense aversion to secular governments and ideologies, the complete shunning of those who believe differently and prescribing a confrontational and strongly polarizing message.”

I believe the variety of evidence from countries and other sources support the assertion that Hizb ut-Tahrir continues to remain a primary threat to our daily lives.   

* * *

For your free jewishinfoNews subscription please enter your email address on the designated link located on the top right-hand side of this post. Your name and email address will never knowingly be shared with third parties.